TamamShamoon's blog

Swordmen have 3x the base health of Wizards. Swordmen also gain additional Block that other classes do not and Swordmen has higher physical defense growth then other classes as well.

Wizards have the least health but gain the most magical defense growth of classes.

Clerics have the second most health and gain the most SP recov of classes.

Archers have the second least health and gain bonus Crit rate, accuracy and evasion.

Since we're dealing with 3x, it means with each level if you're trying to equal a swordmens health a wizard needs more and more Con.

Swordsmen have never been top dps (certain wizard and archer classes did more ways to Buy TOS Silver, yes even with archers large damage penalties) and are unlikely to ever be unless they resolve their health advantage (and yet they've given them increased staying power via CC resistance through Sprint and pain barrier).

Swordsmen damage if anything was and is suspectible to team comp where teammates increase their damage output (lethargy, Snatching, Deprotected zone)

You can kind of see that with Doppelsoeldnr making itself extremely squishy for potential damage or even the idea of Gung-Ho and restrain. This helps to reduce the significance of their health advantage.

Everyone else stays a bruiser.

Swordsmen will get buffed to do more damage but the intentions not to equate to other options... 

To make them equal you'd have to 1) Force other characters to invest more into Con then a swordsmen and then 2) Make the swordmens ability to get less con mean more STR where STR can make up the otherwise large difference to Buy Tree Of Savior Silver. This then trivializes INT unless you have DPS checks which force people to still try and get as much INT/STR as they can while being Wizard/Archers...

Jun 24 '16 · 0 comments · Tags: buy tree of savior silver

Who the designs a system that only monitors for those who are currently online, when deciding which faction is most full Blade And Soul Gold? It should have been more than obvious that people would wait until late hours to choose the dominant faction on each server. 

Yes, these zerg mentality players are part of the problem. Yes, the clan system is fucked up as once again, NCSOFT decided to tag faction labels to the clan, too.

They should make it so the lower faction is given benefits to encourage others to move and they should also make it so it's monitored on a weekly or monthly basis, not leave it to a broken automated system to do it for them, based on who's online at the time.

Have someone scan the week or month for player activity and then make it so people can't choose the full faction, regardless of time of day, until it is balanced.

Yes you can. Most players have a loser mentality wherein if something isnt going their way, they give up R4PG BNS Gold. This holds especially true to our regions where the most toxic people reside on this planet.

Do I think that factions could be done better? Absolutely. Factions could be locked out far better like Tashigi said. They also shouldnt be presented so early on in the game, the choice for factions should be given at the end of Chapter 17 (or 15, I dont remember right), not before that (not to mention it makes no fucking sense story-wise). Faction should also be filled based on amount of people in it and not at the time of day. That being said, I dont believe providing incentives for the losing faction would do much of anything. People would still have the same mentality and would still migrate to the other faction in droves because of a perceived benefit or lack thereof in their current faction. All this would do is have a criss-cross effect where people switch to one faction for a period of time, lose those benefits and switch back to the other. At least, until Silverfrost comes out and faction ranks begin to matter.

I would much rather prefer something different than incentives to join the losing side: a maximum amount of people of a certain faction per channel (ex: xxx blues and xxx reds to Buy Blade And Soul Gold). This gives both sides equal opportunity to zerg the other during faction objectives as well during PvP not to mention it lessens strain on computers and allows more people to participate in these objectives. 

Jun 7 '16 · 0 comments · Tags: blade and soul gold

Game chat didn't appeal to me to begin with R4PG BNS Gold, but with how sensitive your system is I could practicly get banned for writing a short story to a friend in Whisper. 

The only thing I find funny is how other game developers can manage this without getting hundreds of people banned wrongfully and you struggle to do so. Not that I am surprised.

Oh yeah, and before I'd forget: "to be reported with a temp ban" Mind explaining why everyone got a permanent instead? Is this the new meta? Now you go to the support, they review it and reduce it to a temp ban and if you don't do so, goodbye? 

I really don't think it to be mentally healthy for those same people with pending issues and pending tickets to come post on these forums or worst yet the official forums because majority of the easy thinkers will assume they we illegitimate in their playing of the Blade & Soul Gold, which is only natural. 

However, when facts and official sources show that majority of those swept up in the ban wave have gotten a reprieve and hold out on spending on the game for fear of further punishment the banning system creates more problems than it solves, then theres' the forum members who still think "ok they got banned and now they're unbanned and nothing is wrong" and to just move on. Sure, ignore the issue of the methods used for penalizing game exploiters...only until you become a statistic yourself...I'm sure if that happens you'd dare not come on the forms to voice anguish which, like I said earlier, is not a good idea.

Other factors that are not included are, how many people reporting does it take to authorize a ban, cus I block/report spammers, Yet, people like you are worthless to this equation. You don't offer solutions, suggestions and safe bns gold, you just complain and say "YOURE DOING IT WRONG" while making, exaggerated claims. 

Jun 4 '16 · 0 comments · Tags: safe bns gold